Quote:
Originally Posted by directfiesta
what i don't get is how all that speculation of compliance and all .
- guy opens movie business
- guy fully finances projects in movie business
- guy makes ego movie about himself
- guy is way over the budget that oxymoron is supposed to be ( 2 to 8 million )
- guy has an account in st-kitts bank called epassporte
- guy says to bank : I need interim financing on my great movie\
- guy promises to bank that roi on that movie will cover plenty the loan
- bank says to guy: Gimme collateral
- bank takes epass account as colateral
- bank is no dummies : See the movie flopped royally
- bank suspends vv to keep account with cash
as for wallet, maybe they got a court otder to seize, or guy gave them to get off ....
If you are going to sue epassprte , you need to pierce the corporate veil ( which is already exposed ) and show the money in motion to oxymoron ... You maybe wont get it back, but create enough heat that he will be labelled as a cancer in hollywood : Destroy his dream and ego ...
Now , i am ready for the stupid name calling .
|
this
But one thing. Does Mallick have "personal access" to funds in an account of this type?
How could he really pledge an account of this type as collateral?
.......................................