Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
actually read the article the old man was accused of downloading gay porn because his wifi was not secured to military grade basically
now his private information was released to the public because law firm didn't have military grade security on their network.
that 10k per person released
if they are to argue it not our fault our network got hacked, and successfully make that arguement
every pirate can make the same claim
if they fail it 10k per name that was released.
|
The guys wifi wasn't hacked, that's called a bullshit excuse.
The Law firm isn't going to get fined, its limited info and they will get off. The difference between the pirate and the hackers? The hackers didn't download porn, they hacked them, probably because hackers don't care about porn.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
oh btw the youtube thing was paul claiming that viacomm was going to own youtube ass in the lawsuit because they were able to tell the difference between porn and non porn
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=845258
paul robbie and kane basically argued all tried to argue that viacomm was going to lose because they filtered porn. And i argued that would not work because of fair use.
Youtube won as i predicted |
Google uses digital finger printing to identify movies and other technology to identify skin. The digital finger print technology is what will save Google's ass. With Viacomm it will be proving VC uploaded then complained. User uploaded, fair use - isn't what is saving them.
Technically you can upload whatever you want to Google, legally though Google has to remove it anytime they're notified about it. Fair use BECAUSE of user uploads is what keeps them from getting sued before they're notified.