Originally Posted by Angry Jew Cat

So danger ends at an imaginary line in the water? They were gonna cross that imaginary line, so how is being on one side any less dangerous than other when the intended destination is the same? In this case their danger zone was determined their intended action. You have a pretty blunt pattern of thought don't you? They were taking a risk, and they paid for that risk. No matter how many ways your feeble little mind tries to twist it, that is all it boils down to. Disregard the "rights", the "wrongs", and the "moral ethic" of the situation. It is what it is. You're looking more and more like the one with a bias the more you post...