Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus
Yes thank you professor. I understand that porn is protected by the 1st amendment.
But let's cut the shit. Performers in porn arent acting. They're fucking. And they're getting paid to fuck. Same as a prostitute. You put a camera on the former and its protected by the first amendment.
Shouldnt even be an issue as prostitution should be legal but that's a thread for another time.
|
i think there is a lot of acting that goes into fucking. The girls fake it probably 9 out of 10 times. It's just poor acting, but its still acting. What you see on a porn videos doesn't go on in real life, at least not in 99% of the bedrooms out there. And some porn actually has story lines and plots, not just start to finish fucking.
Just like anything else it's the intent. If joe blow takes his camera out and drives up and down the strip for hookers, records himself fucking them and then gets busted and says "its for my porn business", if he has no website, no store, no proof of a business it wont fly. Also a hooker isn't going to sign off on 2257 docs or enter into a contract either.
I've met a few scary guys about 10 years ago that had stacks of polaroid pictures they took of naked girls, they promised the girls would make money but they either didn't have intentions of trying to sell the content or they sucked at it, either way it does provide an avenue for some people to "play" business and have sex for pay and it not be postitution. BUt in the vast majority of the cases I wouldn't say porn = postitution, that there is no acting ,etc... that's not true.