Quote:
Originally Posted by Allison
I'll let Fabian reply. We have no control over how tube site operators choose to deal with watermarked content and their paid partner program.
That rejection has nothing to do with digital finger prints and filtering. In fact, it has the potential for content owners via the monetization program to flag what content submitted is "okay" and should just be let through as is. It actually works the opposite way in which content owners could choose NOT to flag uploaded content say under 2 minutes or whatever they want.
|
ok, but then what you are saying is that "hey, we (topbucks) can upload our watermarked videos but the rest of you are on your own"?
dont get me wrong, i think this whole fingerprinting thing is a positive step, but if program owners are just going to worry about themselves then why continue on with an affiliate program when the deck is stacked against them from the start..
it seems to me that programs are going to be looking out for themselves in the future, which is fine, just tell your affiliates thats your intention...
let the affiliates make an informed decision as to whether or not it makes business sense to keep promoting programs that feel this way...
.