Quote:
Originally Posted by Allison
First, who else would have put the time and effort into negotiating the use of state of the art technology for the benefit of the adult industry as a whole? Who else would have been able to get basically a huge group discount that fits with the majority of the industry's needs?
No private company in this industry would have had the time, energy or desire to spend months to work on something like this. And if a private company did do this, then there would be a whole slew of conflicts of interest.
|
I have nothing against the FSC. But you're kinda making it out like they are doing this out of the goodness of their hearts.
Reality is that it would be a huge money grab if they could somehow pull this off and get all the pirate sites in the world to comply with it.
Step one would be to get some major content producers on board, which would be the conference you guys are having. Then step two would be to pressure some more tube sites into going along with it (the part that is going to be a lot harder).
That would then give SOME protection on some tube sites. And it would make the FSC some money.
I don't see anything wrong with any of that part.
I'd just like to say that there are much, much cheaper ways to do this that are more effective over ALL sites (including bit torrent sites and file share sites and all tube sites).
Not attacking or trying to belittle this little deal. I'm just sayin'...
And yeah, a lot of folks don't trust the FSC at all. They were supposed to be representing a consortium of adult companies in first ammendment cases before the courts. And we all saw how that kinda went.
And now they are jumping into something that they have zero experience with and apparently are still on a learning curve as to what, who, and how piracy is done.
I kinda wish they would go WIN some damn cases against the govt. assault on the porn industry like they are supposed to do. And I'm thinking that is what a lot of other folks are thinking too