View Single Post
Old 10-07-2010, 09:54 AM  
Varius
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 6,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravo View Post
We did the same thing; paid all affiliates from our own pocket.

But, this brings up an interesting point, that I'd like to get your opinion on. Since I don't trust *any* third payment processor, I was thinking of adding something like the following to our terms and conditions;

"We strongly encourage the use of our direct payment options (check, money order, draft, wire). If you choose to use a third party payment processor (eg. Payoneer, Paypal, Paxum), our responsibility to you ends once we fund our account at the third party processor. We are not responsible for the solvency of the third party processor."

Or, is that too harsh?? Your thoughts?
IMO people who see that would take it as you creating an out to play with their money and not like it at all.

ie. you can "say" wallet was funded when you actually didn't and that's why they don't get paid, etc...
__________________
Skype variuscr - Email varius AT gmail
Varius is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote