Quote:
Originally Posted by mariahxxx
i guess when your program has no traffic then you hold onto a $200 grudge since 2006 lol I can link you to the post on GG&J where their rep stated clearly that they eat all charge backs because they have great faith in their scrubbing. it was just funny that the day of payouts is when they decided to create the charge backs. I asked for a month for them to show me the proof of charge backs and they said they were not required to. I was told my account had been cancelled and Karl stopped replying to me yet I continued to get email notifications daily that sales were being made by my referring link and at the EXACT same rate that they were prior to the claim of charge backs? very suspicious to me. oh well, I wrote it off because I can afford to and $4k isn't worth crying over....maybe Mr. B should do the same over his claim of me owing him $200 since 2006 lol
|
If $4k is such a paltry amount that isn't worth crying over then why not pay the guy his measly $200 pittance and get him out of your hair and your thread for good? I swear some of you people would rather lower yourselves to pissing back and forth rather than working out a solution or just flat out dealing with a problem. The guy obviously feels strongly that he's owed, he's provided proof there was an agreement on your part, so why not just end it already and make things right?
Which brings me to Brad Mitchell, the lone voice of reason here. + rep for offering a way to settle the matter.