Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse
Nearly everything I have tried doing has been with an aim of keeping the image as close to the original as possible and get it to pass as NO PIRATE.
Just think that to make your comparison test as good as possible I need to to be trying to think of a way I could get a whole photoset to pass while still having it acceptable to the human eye.
|
Similar to what I said above, you could lower the level to whatever is satisfactory to *not* let false negatives through, which would allow more false positives to show up. However, I suppose this stuff is with the view to scan loads of images per hour and to flag ones that require further intervention by a human eye.
Automated scripts will always cause false negatives and positives, but false negatives are much more costly. Much better to let a human brain search through the results flagged as pirated and toss away the false positives, than it is to allow false negatives slip through.
But yes, you're right - if a photoset contains 15 images - it only takes 1 to be flagged as pirated to raise the alarm bell on the photoset.