Quote:
Originally Posted by Allison
Well, I'll give you a personal example. We've had our content finger printed & we used the APAP software to track all of our content on all 16 sites they had at the time. We also had an employee here individually go through all of the videos on about 5 different tubes and it took him about 2 weeks per tube site to do in detail.
Every single video he found was also found by the technology. Out of 1,000 videos found across 16 tube sites, only 5 were false positives where they were not our videos.
So that's just a statement to it's accuracy that we've seen.
Regarding workarounds. If a UGC company is agreeing to participate in the program in order to comply with UGC principles/DMCA, that's a non issue. If a UGC company refuses to participate & then does whatever it can to evade tracking I believe they would be positioning themselves for even more liability and there would be evidence gathered by the tracking software demonstrating that evasion.
|
That's not what I am saying AT ALL.
What I am saying is, how can you find the infringing videos if they (tube sites or whoever) don't let your software have access to the videos in the first place?