Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie g
Per PornHub.com TOS ~
"[I]You agree that Pornhub may at its sole discretion have the right to refuse to publish, remove, or block access to any User Submission that is available via the Website or other Pornhub network or services at any time, for any reason, or for no reason at all, with or without notice.
|
I just wanted to quote that again, thanks Charlie.
Forget DMCA, it is in violation of their site terms.
Anything that violates their TOS should supersede a DMCA, as it has broken their site terms and at that point
has nothing to do with DMCA, it is simply a matter of a user who violated the rules of the site, which at that time Pornhub or whoever *may* at their sole discretion to pretty much to anything they want.
That is the reason for TERMS.
I find it absolutely hilarious that a guy, a programmer nonetheless, can buy such an expensive criminal enterprise... I mean business, and have absolutely no clue over the day to day operations of it or even who in the FBI you have contact with to report child porn when it's uploaded. Both a programmer and a man of such wealth has to pay attention to details, that is why they can do what they do. How can you delegate responsibilities if you don't even know why the fuck is going on or what you can and can not do? Don't worry, no answer is required until you check with the attorney about what you should say.
Regardless of all that, I'd still like to cum in Nathan's ass.