Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
you people are full of so much bullshit. Ruth you blamed it on Paxum users saying that they used a form that should have been used by Program owners. You blame the Paxum users for using a form that was for Program Owners.
Octav says it was companies submitted from users that they should add. Octav blames the designer for publishing a list of companies they *want* to add.
Makes no fucking sense. If the "submit form" was for program owners then it wouldn't be a list of people you want to add, they would already be added.
Octav is saying he knew it was from webmasters, you are saying "opps" that was suppose to be from program owners, we *just* finding out about it now.
So either you guys knew the programs being submitted on that page from webmasters and not owners and you did nothing about it, or you guys are just plain stupid and have no idea what you are doing.
christ, 1+1 = 36 around here.
|
Seriously Will, I thought you had some businesses to run rather than just go on about semantics.
I am an account rep for Paxum. I see this thread getting fatter and fatter, I am aware of the basic explanation as to what happened here today, and so I post what I know.
Octav does a follow-up post providing additional information that further elaborates exactly what caused this error to occur. His definition of the list and my interpretation of the online form and its purpose may not be exactly 100% equal, however the main 'gist' of the situation is the same:
The names submitted through that form were inadvertently published on our pages, and it was a mistake that we apologize for and have corrected.
If you take a look at this thread, you'll see it was NOT to our advantage for this to happen in any way shape or form!
