Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
You show your ignorance of this niche with every post you make on it.
a) With real amateur content you can get away with images only. This only works if they buy it as a REAL girl.
b) They pay less because this shit should be easier to shoot. Millions of people do it in their bedrooms every day.
c) Nobody wants 4 or 5 scenes of the same girl for an exgf site. This kind of amateur content is a collection of random, every day pics and / or videos. It's not some preplanned shot of 'Kate in a yellow dress' 'Kate goes for a walk' it's what you would end up with by searching through the private photos of real life couples.
d) You don't have to produce exgf content. You have to buy rights to it from the damn people that shot it. Don't you get it? A package of 500 images from 10 girls all using the same damn camara, resolution, style, house, etc is FUCKING WORTHLESS.
I usually ignore you but I'm sick of reading your half cocked theories on this niche. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.  |
Which is why it's so easy to get hold of and the market is flooded with it.
Without professionals shooting it, relying on amateurs to shoot, provide 2257 documents, model releases and license is obviously not working. Yes lots of it is produced by real amateurs, BUT THEY AIN'T SELLING IT LEGITIMATELY. If they were there would be no shortage.
How do you know that none of the girls in the pictures you posted are under 18. That any of them signed a model release, that any of the content was licensed, that any of the girls will take the sites to court for publishing their images. OR GO AFTER THE BILLING COMPANY FOR THE SITE?
You don't because you scraped the content off sites that probably scraped it off other sites. That's called pirating by the site and you. Or is it acceptable to repost any content once it's on the Internet?
All the things you point out can be easily learned or not by getting a complete amateur to shoot the stuff, as I said. The problem is getting good looking girls willing to do this, on a legal basis, for the money that's being offered.
You show your ignorance of producing legal content. I've been doing it for 33 years. How long have you been doing it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
There are quite a few places you can buy up real amateur content from real people. The problem with simon and everyone else is that they are cheap asses and want to pay $100 to for some girls images then turn around and sell them 500 or 5000 times. Who the fuck would be interested in that?
|
Cheap asses or can't afford to pay more?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pompousjohn
Users want glimpses of random drunk women goofing off in front of a mirror on the way to or from clubbing, and content shooters are never going to be able to produce that in bulk.
|
We can't shoot a girl in a nightclub getting drunk, in bulk? Of course we can. We're just not doing it for $300 a set. Party Hardcore do it all the time with hundreds of girls. But it costs a little more than $150 a set.
And there's the answer to stocktrader.
Fill a nightclub with cute girls, do the 2257 and model release before they go in, ply them with drinks (that they agreed to in the model release) then shoot them on mobile phones and cheap cameras. Offering $50 to flash their tits or panties and $100 to flash their pussy. Party Hardcore do it with girls giving male strippers blow jobs. So flashing ain't a problem. Paying for it is.
But as stocktrader said the niche is full of cheap legal content.