Originally Posted by mynameisjim

How can you argue whether it was her shoulder or head that got stepped on?

When a woman is on the ground and motionless, there is no need to put your foot on any part of her body. By the time that clown stepped on her, she was already totally overpowered and subdued and clearly not a threat to anyone. That guy is a total pussy and stepped on a woman when she was already tackled and on the ground. Forget the politics, stomping on a women in that situation makes you a total loser.

How can people defend that? I can see an argument for why she was forcibly pulled away from the car. I don't agree with it, but I can see how an argument can be made for that. But the stomping was totally out of line and criminal no matter how you look at it.