Originally Posted by Cyandin

No, you're absolutely right in that regard, and that is not a logical basis from which to assume conspiracy, in and of itself.

What I look at are cases such as the "plane crashing" into the Pentagon. When ----O---- is the shape of the front of a jet (you like my awesome graphical depiction there?) and you get this tiny little 10 foot wide hole in the building, that's just ridiculous. They failed to retrieve one single piece of airplane from that crash, and no black box. Never in the history of modern commercial aviation has a wreck failed to produce rubble, except when the plane crashed in the sea in water too deep to affordably go chasing after it.

Or, take Building 7. Why did it collapse? Out of sheer astonishment at watching the other two go down? Nothing hit it! There is no conceivable reason except deliberate demolition that it would collapse, especially in the same morning as the other two building on 9/11.

I'm not saying I have all the answers here, by any means. I'm not even saying that it's not possible that there could be a non-conspiratorial explanation, but from what any smart person can make of what we DO know, these two example events did NOT play out the way we were told to believe.