Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
This case is about her leaving them in a folder that shared them with potentially millions of other people.
|
if that were the case should would have been convicted for all 1700 songs she "shared"
the reason it down to 24 songs is because kazza automatically indexed the my music folder, and she ripped all her cd to that folder.
she was convicted for the 24 songs she didn't personally rip.
kazza is a file locating protocol not session based like bit torrent so remember just by having the file in the folder she was sharing it
BTW Doc
this legitimized "not my fault defence" was what this article is misrepresenting as "i was not the file sharer defence"
20th century vs Cablevision ruled that when defining fair use you must look at it from the prespective of the end user when the US supreme court upheld that decision it made that POV rule of law.