Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
1 the case started win her being convicted of 1700 violations
and is now down to 24
common sense should tell something happened to eliminate most of those violations she first got convicted of
just because the blogger doesn't give you all the facts doesn't mean they don't exist
read the actual case. This has been something i have repeatedly talked about here
and there are dozens of articles, and transcripts that tell you exactly why most of the songs stopped being violations.
(see the reason i gave you)
|
First... It was 1700 she was sued for originally, ie: they blanked her. Then after the VERY FIRST court case, it was 24 that she lost on. She has lost on the same 24 songs, 3 times total.
"
On October 4, 2007, after 5 minutes of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict finding her liable for willful infringement, and awarded statutory damages in the amount of $9,250 for each of the 24 songs, for a total of $222,000." <---- first trial
Here are the facts.... You've never read the case or the transcripts. And the only information you have about this case, you've probably read from torrent news sites or... like the rest of us, news AFTER the court ruling happened.