Quote:
Originally Posted by Slutboat
MSNBC is standing for an American principle that Fox flagrantly shits on.
|
What principle? Having unbiased news?
Seriously though, what's the difference between anchors that support a particular party all day long with their words/actions and anchors that support a particular party with money? Does supporting them with money somehow trump the fact that they incite/reaffirm the views behind such support all day long on TV? What difference is there? Seriously, I'm all ears on this one. It's not like Olbermann woke up and suddenly changed from being an objective news personality to being a subjective one with this contribution. They didn't fire Olbermann the moment he showed clear liberal bias, they fired him for making what is honestly an inconsequential contribution of money to a party. If you want to pat them on the back for having that policy or for sticking to their guns and enforcing the policy even on someone like Olbermann even on an inconsequential sum of moeny, then I can understand that, but to act like they are being altruistic and proving non-bias with the policy and/or its enforcement is ludicrous.
People like you hound Fox News for their "fair and balanced" bs (and rightfully so)...how can you possibly read more into this other than they have a particular policy which really has no bearing on how biased they are, someone broke that policy and got fired?