View Single Post
Old 11-12-2010, 01:51 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane View Post
gideongallery (and Nathan), the safe harbor is only at risk if you remove user submission by same time making official statement that the reason is infringement (your belief or assumption).

That is editorial. Removing for any other or no reason is not editorial. You can say "I don't like you - therefor I deleted you and your submission", and there is no law preventing you from doing that.

no competent lawyer would say that
1. that doesn't even meet the dictionary definition of editorial control

by definition editorial control is the ability to edit or change the expression of the author based on the desires of the editor .

i don't like you so i am going to censor your expression completely is still editorial control.


secondly there are more then just DMCA laws to worry about

the eharmony lawsuit proves that, they choose to deny their services to gays because (as they claimed) the cost of doing the research to define the compatiblity questions would not be recoverable given the small size of the demographic (10% of the population).

That is a hell of a lot more defendable position then i am doing it because i don't like you

AND THEY STILL LOST

my lawyer says their a liablity, NAT lawyer says their a liability, your just Guy on GFY who has been proven wrong multiple times already.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote