Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
However, this is the porn business and others in the same business are stealing my videos.
There is a difference.
I do not base my ethics in this business on mainstream or any other factor than what is the acceptable standard of this business. If I were to base what is ethical in the porn business based on my non-adult values, most of the thieves would be dead already, as I don't consider human life very valuable when that human steals from me, as they are also stealing from my family. In the real world, and if I catch you inside my house, that is punishable by death. Luckily for all of you and unfortunate for me, there is a difference between the two.  |
this statement makes no sense, the market is moving towards tubes as the new primary traffic source.
ethics by the way are not supposed to be fluid and dependent on what the enviroment is.
by definition that is an unethical principle, in fact it given it own name situational ethics.
My moral compass is defined by one simple rule your right end the second mine begin, and vice versa.
I never demand 1 rule for myself and another for other people, irregardless of what the market conditions are around me.
so i will ask the question again, would you defend your position that TOS should over write the law if a tube site used their TOS to force you put your shit in the public domain if you sent them a takedown request.
I have repeatedly pointed out exactly what they would have to say to do it.
while you have repeatedly called Nat out to do something that even youtube doesn't do
demanding that he extend TOS and accept a liablity he currently avoids, would you except such an extension if it worked against you.