Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
laws exist, the constitution does not exist, your trying to argue that even though the laws DOES exist, it should not apply.
|
Existence of laws in general is not the same as existence of a specific law. It can't be illegal if there are no law against it. Don't you understand that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
there is always a law against it, becaue your TOS is defined by contract law, the principle of law that allow you to sue for disputes in contracts. and those laws are bound by the constitution, which defines what type of laws congress can make.
|
Again, there are no law "against" a contract. There are only laws that tell what you can't write and how you can/can't create a contract.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
having to have a legitimate reason doesn't create a situation where you can't stop porn from being posted on youtube, porn is a valid reason for stopping content as long as you apply that rule to every every single time . Allow one guy to post porn, and your going to get your ass sued for discriminiation when you remove someone elses porn.
IT not discrimination if you universally apply the rules.
|
With that argument, I could sue pornhub for discrimination, if they block or remove a porn movie I uploaded to their server? You better ask Nathan about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
When you take down non takedown (false takedown request happen all the time so you can use the word infringing) just for TOS violation, you lose the safe harbor and don't replace it with anything. Ergo you create a potential liablity for yourself.
|
Infringements and other TOS violations are two different things covered by different laws. Learn it!