|
Some of you are so slow it really does make me sad.
Nobody here is saying that the "official version" is 100% accurate. However, the body of evidence more closely backs this explanation than it does any of the existing "truther" theories.
Much of what happened has been explained. Much of the motiviations, planning, participants, et all may not be. That is to say we can be sure planes did in fact hit the towers (and Pentagon you morons) and the towers fell. Who knew what, when or may or may not have been involved in the planning we don't know. Is it POSSIBLE that the US government knew more and did nothing? Absolutely. It's also possible that yes it was an act commited by agents of the US government. I don't think it's likely, but it damn sure is a possibility however remote. If you want to ask questions and dig at motivations in this arena, I don't think anyone would label you as being crazy.
It's a little bit illogical to discount a massive body of work explaining what happened, based on the available evidence, as simply being "part of the coverup". The NIST report was not compiled by government employees. It's a huge body of scientists. Simply saying they're all on the take is akin to saying "I know you are but what am I." to win an argument. It's compounded in to craziness when you're unwilling to accept a well supported theory but quick to conclude that "Hey I saw flashes, it must be explosives!". The only reason somebody jumps to that conclusion is because they started out with it. You're seeing what you want to and it's ridiculous.
What is bat-shit-crazy, however, is morons like Pornofan69 who not only believe this is the work of an international super secret society that dominate the entire World, but they also believe ridiculous things like these people left clues for us in movies like the Matrix. Absolutely absurd.
__________________
.
|