Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Been watching them today. None of them are making jack shit. That's what I pointed out. Looks to me like a lot of the guys on there are teenagers without credit cards...not all, but probably a damn big percentage.
And Claudia-Marie is the ONLY girl I can honestly use as a litmus test since I am privy to what she makes because I see it. Everything and everybody else is just guessing. I don't want to "guess". I do sort of know the numbers of a couple of other girls, but I can't really disclose those since it's not my place to.
And the reason there aren't any big tit pornstars on there is because they've mostly already tried it out when they first heard the hype for it. And when they realized they couldn't make as much money there...they all went to whatever cam site that they DO make the most money at.
Look guys, I'm not saying that lightning doesn't strike. I'm just saying it strikes pretty damn good over at Streamate too sometimes. And in between those big crazy ones...you know, day to day income...it's consistently great and easy money.
I'm sure that there are some girls on there who make pretty good money consistently too. I never underestimate girls ability to get our money. heh-heh
But I don't think it's the gold mine that some of y'all do. And I can only speak from actually watching someone do it.
EDIT: One hunnert girls going "Crazy" with mega-tips from teenage boys with no credit cards and other assorted freeloaders.
|
you can only use claudia as a litmus test if the site will make money for HER not if there is money to be made on the site. She simply doesn't fit the mold for what is popular on that site. There isn't many if any girls who look like her on the front page (top couple 100 girls) therefore there is likely very little traffic/customers/money on the site to be spent on girls like her.
You can speak from her experiences and the time you spent on the site. I already explained off why her experience would not be representative of the norm, but honestly how in the hell can you monitor everythign that goes on there. There are 100s of rooms going 24/7, you can only be in 1 room at a time, and how many hours did you spend there. Just because you didn't see it happen at the exact time you were in 1 out of 100's of rooms doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Don't be so closed minded man. You gave it a couple hour shot, you didn't like the results, all you established is that it didn't work for her.
Not to mention your comparison is skewed. How long has she been working on streamates. I think it is safe to say she has a regular base of loyal repeate member on streamates. That definetly influences the avg per day she makes. You went and tried a new site for a couple hours where she has no history, no repeat member, following already established. Did you really expect her to make more or less? If she worked MFC and built up regulars for as long as she has been on streamates it is possible she could posibly make more on MFC even since she isn't the prototypical girl for that site.
MFC is a different animal, you say "beg" is unprofessional, dude its a different business model , the girls hussle there and get low budget people to collectively spend a decent amount of money. Where as on traditional cam sites the big spenders come in ready to spend and she doesnt have to focus on selling as much as providing a good show.
Think it through, don't be so closed minded and quick to judge something just because you tested it for a couple hours and surfed some rooms. Honestly it sounds like to me you just trying to justify the site as not good because she didn't do great on it.