Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny B!
It should fall on the accuser to provide proof or be banned not the other way around.
|
Correct.
If you are going to accuse someone of something, have proof and post it with the O.P. or , with allegation. If you do not have that, you should be banned according to the rules.
The rule exists because of people take their personal vendettas and agenda to the boards in an attempt to smear someone's name and business based on the "so I heard", or the half truths, third party stories, or making statements with a questions mark, and those similar type of remarks with nothing to back them up.
Hence the rule.