Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash
Let's try to put this train back on the rails...
That's not the shittiest change in TOS I've seen, but still pretty shady IMO.
I don't think any program enjoys when webmasters bring something to the boards, I feel them on that- 9 times out of 10 it's a blown out misunderstanding that could have been handled with a simple email or ICQ.... but board posts get results, it's the culture we've created.
An affiliate's account balance is revenue they've worked for, it's their fucking paycheck. If someone works for you in an office, puts in a 9 to 5, and calls you an asshole at the end of the week- sure you get to fire that person, but you don't get to shred their paycheck.
Every company has the right to choose who they do and do not do biz with, but to hold earnings hostage.. that shit is just beyond petty.  |
Yeah I can understand why programs don't want affiliates running to the boards when most of the time its a simple misunderstanding that can be worked out directly between them. However, in this case, Dave not only chose to cancel affiliates without an explanation, but ignored emails from them asking what was going on. He left them with no choice but to go to the boards, and then ignored threads by them asking what was going on. Now it just looks like he changed the TOS so he'd have justification to keep monies owed.
__________________
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Its crazy..."
VenusBlogger