Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
I dont believe the "threat" can be solved. It's a done deal.
Your side is welcome to investigate wether or not funding plays a role in influencing science, and I strongly urge you to do so. Such investogations can only strengthen the scientific community.
I'm not ignoring funding issue you describe, altho I'm curious how you think that so many scientists around the planet, funded by so many different institutions, are in collusion?
Your side has had years now to come up with evidence to support your charge, yet as far as I can tell, despite the fact that this would make HUGE media news, you have been unable to support your claim.
You've been told to repeat this argument by the media, and I doubt you have even thought about wether or not there have been any facts or investigations to support it.
I urge you to find evidence to support your theory. present it here and let's examine it.
|
good post, but evidence did come out. correspondence between scientists leading the charge, privately discussing how to fudge data and mislead the public when hotter temperatures were not showing up a year or so ago. they knew it could hurt their funding, and they discussed how to fake the data to protect their cash cow.