Originally Posted by Bill8

You're the one making the attack, it's only polite for me to allow you to take the strike.

however, in addition, it's important to outline the quality of the knowledge on which you are basing your attack.

I have argued that it is purely media "knowledge", that you have been told to say a certain thing, and you don't even understand what it is that you have been told to repeat.

that you have no real sense of the actual events or issues involved, and haven't really studied it or even thought about it much, and that your sole source of knowledge on the subject comes from well known media sources, particularly from the murdoch media empire.

prove me wrong. explain the issues, and explain why the investgations of the most heavily investigated science scandal of our time, and possibly ever, were incorrect.