Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
You're the one making the attack, it's only polite for me to allow you to take the strike.
however, in addition, it's important to outline the quality of the knowledge on which you are basing your attack.
I have argued that it is purely media "knowledge", that you have been told to say a certain thing, and you don't even understand what it is that you have been told to repeat.
that you have no real sense of the actual events or issues involved, and haven't really studied it or even thought about it much, and that your sole source of knowledge on the subject comes from well known media sources, particularly from the murdoch media empire.
prove me wrong. explain the issues, and explain why the investgations of the most heavily investigated science scandal of our time, and possibly ever, were incorrect.
|
you are using good, although transparent, debate tactics i will grant you that. the problem you have run into is that i have no interest in debating you.
your assertion that media profits from global warming more than scientists is laughable.
you believe in scientists. i believe in scientists.
when scientists can get billions of dollars for agreeing with certain data interpretations, i see the billions of dollars and understand.