Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
which is why I strongly urge your side to conduct it's own investigations, and i strongly hope that further investigations are carried out.
so, what about it - why is your side unwilling to conduct it's own public investigations?
surely given all the emphasis your side places on this issue, someone on your side MUST have investigated, or at least have plans to investigate.
No? Nobody on your side? I wonder why? The emails are in the public domain now, there is nothing preventing your side from examining them and comparing their judgements with teh published investigations, looking for bias. Nothing stopping them from interviewing, nothing stopping them from asking other experts, nothing stopping them from publishing their findings.
Not a thing is stopping them. Perhaps they are waiting for a letter from you, asking why they haven't done so?
---
there is another kind of investogation being carried out by the peer review process within the science community, but it will be several more years before the judgements of that community are known.
|
Define "your side" because I'm quite unsure as to what you're referring to.
Talking about the denial of global warming? There's quite a few. Obviously, the largest are energy companies.
Do you even know who funded the CRU during its founding in 71? Do you know who still funds the CRU?
What about Stringer who denied the report's findings saying there's not enough information one way or the other?
Roger Pielke?
I mean, what are you looking for, an entire list? If you're unable to establish contrarian reviews, you're not looking hard enough.