Originally Posted by Bill8

in no way shape or form did I rely on that suggestion. My rhetoric was a challenge to the quality of his information, and that challenge stands on its own, and can easily be refuted simply by presenting the quality of the information that he had.

At which point I am free to examine the actual quality of the information presented.

I suggested the murdoch source as editorial comment at the end of my rhetorical presentation.

it is false and either ignorant or malicious for you to claim that i used the
murdorch source comment as a critical element in my debate tactic.

however, I do stand behind my editorial comment. If you seriously believe that he was not influenced by murdochian media rhetoric, I challenge you to present to me an alternative explanation.

then I will happily examine with you the quality of your evidence.