Quote:
Originally Posted by VGeorgie
Again, this has NOTHING to do with 2257, so it doesn't matter where Paul lives. However, if a prosecutor continues to believe Paul is the source of material that is found in court to be CP, he can certainly be the subject of an extradition order.
He also is subject to civil liability if defendant (or website) becomes claimant in a civil suit, and continues to insist Paul is the source of the material, and where he warranted that all models were 18+. You can be sued from anywhere in the world, and a default judgment against you could be collected at any point in your revenue stream where there is jurisdiction. Paul does a lot of business with US concerns.
|
This thread is a warning to those who don't take 2257 and record keeping seriously. Where ever they are in the world. It's not only about protecting under age and those who don't want their private porn movies made public.
It's more about protecting us from 17 year olds who think making some money in porn is a good idea for them, unscrupulous shooters in places we can't check up on and from being dragged through court.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
this is why Paul is listed as a custodian of records on a site he has no records of selling to. industry filled with clowns. i've seen the same 2257 page literally on hundreds of sites and Paul is on them all with that Bananpro name.
with the morons who work in law enforcement this could develop into a comedy of errors clusterfuck - 'hey your name is on the site pal as the record keepin guy, yer in deep doo doo, it didn't get there by accident know what i mean mr check o slovakia child pornographer!'
|
Exactly. This site is a strange case. It still lists me and a few others, even though the owner has been notified. Some who I have no idea if they're still in the business.
But yes I don't appreciate being tied to a site I have no record of that's in the cross hairs of the DA for CP. Especially when I powerless to answer.