Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Right that's my point. It's "close" to prostitution. Some people, lawyers or otherwise, would argue whether it is or it isn't. The argument could be : "He paid to join her site, he had sex with her". Legal or not, a policy review person at Visa might also look at it this way.
I'm just wondering if a lawyer was consulted before offering this contest to your members and if so, what did he or she say?
|
There is no quid pro quo. The offer centers on a population from which CM will select her short term partners, and there is no guarantee of sexual services. Membership exists without that incentive, and would continue to persist, she merely chooses among them. Hence, the expectation exists because she is voracious sexually and restricts her partner population to her constituents, not because of payment.