Quote:
Originally Posted by Caligari
you're getting off the reality track here.
1)he was living with his parents at the time of the murders
2)he was always living with his parents
3)if you are a parent and your children are still living with you (regardless of what age) you have the responsibility to make sure that your brood is mentally stable.
4)this guy went out and massacred 6 people and tried to take out many more, what more do you want for warning signs? do you think he just "snapped" one day? obviously not, his behaviour prior to the incident shows clear, dangerous tendencies. the parents ignored these tendencies and in doing so are culpable.
bottom line is parents have the responsibility to ask the tough questions without rose colored glasses.
parents are responsible for their offspring if their offspring are living in the same house with them.
another article on huffpost "the parents are devastated" no shit! they're always devastated wtf! they're always shocked that their darling boy is in fact a mass murderer because the problem with being a parent is that its quite easy...you just need to fuck and pop out a baby, nevermind having actual parental skills...
bottom line is that its easier to blame a gun than to get to the more complicated mess of getting to the psychological root 
|
where did you read about his behavoir prior to the incident? parents can only do so much. i did some bad shit when i was younger but my parents were not in any way to blame. they were my actions, not theirs.
like i said before, even if it were found out that he was mentally unstable, would the current laws stopped him from getting a gun? because he wouldn't of been locked up, having not previously caused himself or others any harm.