Quote:
Originally Posted by choona
Disclaimer:I'm a newbie my self, and don't claim to be an SEO or traffic expert. Take my advice with a grain of salt.
ABCD looks like:
Your Site A -> Their Site B
Their Site C -> Your Site D
There are no links between A D or B C
The reason for this type of trade is that it looks one way to Google.
See linkspun-dot-com. Your can set up these kinds of trades there.
Connect the blog network to Free6, but not each other. Instead link exchange with other webmasters.
It might affect bounce rate. Imagine a lesbian fan seeing a penis, or a teen fan seeing granny porn. Eeww gross!
For example on your "babes" page let other webmaster with "babes" websites link to and link to others "babes" websites on that page.
Other things to fix: - name your images with a descriptive title. Instead of 948046.jpg Name it BBW Cutie.jpg
- give them alt tags. similar to naming but more detailed
- sprinkle in a few keywords
|
Your grain of salt is better taste than without
I got the idea regarding linking, simple is that i need a lot more smaller sites that
I can use for tradining to others and they point to the free6 site.
The list i was planing was indeed to the same category, babes sites will only be viewed
on babes category etc, a general best top friends will only be published on the front page.
I had plans to name then after the title of each gallery i have like babes-like-it-both-holes-948046.jpg , or do it on a server level to rewrite the request to the right thumb, but
i rather stay away from rewrite rules and keep it simple in one way or another.
It's a good idea and with alt tag, i'll implant that later on, how is it to use title instead of alt tag ? Alt is only used when you can't see the picture, but title mess things up when I'm using javascript to get the hoverd text, like double title.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bns666
lose the frames ftw
it's 2011.
|
Indeed, but loading other sites in a <div><iframe></iframe></div> with working scrolls
was a pain, thereof the old design, better be up and still thinking how to do it. There is always a v2 - i'm more a hardware/code freak than a design guru ;)
Google dont mind frames you know, it works very well indeed, problem is that with so little text and loads of thumbs it's hard to get anything good done, people dont care about the text, just the thumbs.
Most code under the hood are prepared for running either onepage design or with jquery later on, all depends how google will see the site and how much it can index. I'm rather go a way that works for me, the surfers and for google.
Since we have ~ 370.000 galleries, thats the same number of uniq 'pages' so we will see what google says about that, not to count all kind of versions of the category pages, since each category can be viewed in all, pictures only or videos/movies only.
Made a script to build the sitemap files and using a sitemap index file, around 400.000 uniq urls you possible visit on the site, i have't released it yet until we are
on the new server but i'm worried how google will see on this.
For me this is a school, to learn and adopt new ways and benefit from it ;)
Thanks for the input so far