Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopottomouse
Article makes it sound like they tried dropping the cases after the judge had decided they had done something iffy. Not surprised they can't pull out really.
|
the process these guys were following has been iffy from the begining
their arguement was that if your ip address was being used, that automatically ment you were aware and authorized the transaction so that it would qualify for "wilful" infringement.
the problem is steve /robbie etc are basically copying this bogus process to do their sue the downloaders stuff too