Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
No the point of the John Doe is so you can sue and use the court to force people you couldn't otherwise ask, to give up the needed information.
The bar hasn't changed... The Judges have said, they CAN sue, just do it in the right district. Another words, blanket attacks wont get you far, but if you want to blanket the attack per state, and you have a lawyer in that state, have at it.
|
really then why was the case that was in the correct jurisdiction also throw out.
ALL the case were thrown out not just the ones outside the jurisdiction
and yes the bar has changed
you can no longer claim that paying for the internet connection means your authorizsing every use of that connection including people hopping on your unsecured/secured wifi connection.
why because
Quote:
|
iJudge Birss later noted: ?A key part of the plea of infringement rests on an assertion [by ACS:Law] that ?allowing? others to infringe is itself an infringing act, when it is not.?
|
JDS do not nor have they ever given you blanket right to force people to give up their private information
one of the conditions for a JDS to go forward is that the case must have merits
the fundamental merits of the plea (not the JDS the entire plea) has been challenged and found wanting,
only a complete moron would claim that this doesn't raise the bar on these types of cases.