Quote:
Originally Posted by jonnydoe
OK good then, just wanted to make sure. We are in agreement a woman has a right to choose (to a point on my part and most people I think). What inflamed me was your statement that was this "would have been a beautiful and sacred act displaying a woman's right to choose if they had managed to do it while still inside the woman's body". Would they still cut off babies feet and jar them up? Use 15 year old children to administer anesthesia in an operating room with a catbox in it? This is not a late term abortion debate...it is way beyond that. To defend your odd comments is beyond any logic. Best of luck with your Porn Green program buddy...
|
im glad you now see we are in agreement. to answer your question, no they would not jar the babies feet in a legal abortion. after cutting the baby into pieces inside the mother they would remove all the parts including the babies feet and place them in trash bags, not jars.
i fail to see how my comments are odd. anti-abortion fanatics would try to use this news to say that all abortion is bad. i am pointing out that while what this monster did to born babies is "grisly" as you put it, a women's rights are an important and sacred thing and a woman's right to choose should not be put in jeopardy because of what this guy did.