Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
really then why was the case that was in the correct jurisdiction also throw out.
ALL the case were thrown out not just the ones outside the jurisdiction
and yes the bar has changed
you can no longer claim that paying for the internet connection means your authorizsing every use of that connection including people hopping on your unsecured/secured wifi connection.
why because
|
Nothing has been tossed out... the outcome of this court has hasn't been decided.
Here in the States, a Judge has already made it clear you have to sue in the proper jurisdiction.
Well gee, the bar changed for the people with wifi connections - which isn't everyone. Of course, unless the person has a new HD, it's 'very easy' to see what files they've downloaded to the pc directly, even if they deleted them..... your arguments are so weak.
Oh and before you say otherwise... Courts have already done this in other cases, I recall a CP case they pulled old/deleted images from the drive, so it's not like it can't happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
JDS do not nor have they ever given you blanket right to force people to give up their private information
one of the conditions for a JDS to go forward is that the case must have merits
the fundamental merits of the plea (not the JDS the entire plea) has been challenged and found wanting,
only a complete moron would claim that this doesn't raise the bar on these types of cases.
|
None of this has to do with a subpoena... which can be used to get a wide range of information. Btw, your lame twist of "force people to give up their private information" is stupid... Nobody ever said they did, nobody is making them do so.
At that, "
‘allowing’ others to infringe is itself an infringing act, when it is not.” - first this has nothing to do with what I said and second, I never argued otherwise - hell you can ignore this all together and still nail 99% of the people for pirating.
P.S. I don't really care what the UK is doing..