Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Fact: Not everyone has wifi getting these letters.
|
so there should be an issue with NOT sending letters to the wifi people
Quote:
|
Fact: MOST people DID pirate the content, and did NOT get hacked.
|
fantastic so there should be no problem producing that proof before sending out the threatening letter.
Quote:
|
Fact: No pirate on the planet is going to crack wpa/mac address protection on a wifi, wait for that slow ass mess to happen, taking days (not hours) to download/upload crap, when the jackass down the street has an open connection.
|
try 20 minutes the average person secures their wifi with a login id that a real world word
a dictionary slam will get by that in under 20 minutes.
Quote:
|
Fact: Anyone with the tech ability to do the above, can EASILY mask who they are online, without hacking a wifi - even a completely open one would be stupid backwards for them. We're talking about Piracy here - Not actually doing something dirty.
|
so the publicly logged ip address is not really actual downloader of the content,
you mean ip address information is credible prooft of identity because real hackers can mask their identity thru