Quote:
Originally Posted by V_RocKs
My theory... and it is only a theory...
If you have a blog network and that is it. You don't need to spread them. Just trade with other blogs like usual and there would be no point in separating them all out on different class C's.
If your blogs are going to be expected to point to specific landing sites then you should separate them if they are going to be linking into your landing sites that won't be having those trades.
Why this theory? Because somebody once decided to create a massive amount of thumblogger and blogger.com blogs and linked those massive amounts into specific landing pages. Google caught wind of this and created something to stop it.
Some say Google put at least some weight on the IP's, but then that wouldn't work with blogger.com because the system uses more than one. So logically Google started seeing subdomains as one domain to some extent. Some algorithmic solution possibly sees subs as only .2 of a domain instead of being a fully completed domain or slides the scale down as more subs from a domain are added. So having 5 subs link into you from thumblogger is worth 1 full domain, but having 2000 is worth .2 of a domain because adding more removes the value instead of adding.
So do class C's even matter anymore? I can't say for sure except that I have all of my sites separated and all of my blogs and I can get #1's for some nice keywords for those sites just by linking into them from only my blogs. Does that have anything to do with my class C's?
Maybe... maybe not. But do you expect me to change that up when it ain't broken?
|
V-Rocks. So with your theory are you saying that 5 would be the sweetspot when using free-hosted blogs and do you think that you should limit subdomains on your own sites to 5?