50/50 means 50/50; which means splitting all the fees.
But almost no sponsors make affiliates pay
charge back fees.
The CCbill option is good for affiliates because the sponsor can turn off
the split fees and thus
increase the affiliate payout.
If CCbill advertised they process 50/50 and didn't split the fees then that
would be bad advertising to the sponsor; wouldn't it?
I mean, the sponsor signed up and only got 40%?
Would that be a problem that this was not explained to the sponsor?
The affiliate on the other hand has no complaint since they are always
getting better than 50/50 no matter what, especially since the affiliate doesn't
pay charge back fees.
If affiliates really want a true 50/50 then I expect a lot of angry affiliates
after they join a sponsor and send 2 sign ups that charge back and they
end up owning the sponsor $30 after they are invoiced for their half of the
charge back fees.
This shit has been figured out over years.
Stop un-fucking-figuring it OK!
