01-26-2011, 04:57 PM
|
|
|
there's no $$$ in porn
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
|
EC's leak describes blocking as "challenging", "costly" and ineffective
but they're keeping that secret and are still going to vote on it.
Quote:
A leaked draft of the European Commission's (EC) Green Paper on gambling
provides some valuable insights into the Commission's views on web blocking.
Firstly, contrary to Commissioner Malmström's repeated promises to the
contrary, the leak shows that the Commission has no objections in principle
to blocking being used against content other than child abuse. The document
states that blocking of unlicensed gambling websites "might be justified".
The draft policy document goes on to describe what it sees as a key
advantage of DNS blocking - that it can be used to hijack users' connections
to direct them to approved sites.
Nonetheless, while in favour of blocking in principle, the document
explicitly recognises that blocking is "technically challenging and costly"
and that blocking will leave a "significant" residual level of illegal sites
publicly available. In particular, and this is of importance for blocking in
relation to child abuse material, the document says that regular updating of
a blocking list will be "costly" - a point studiously avoided by the
European Commission in the blocking debate so far.
Meanwhile, the Civil Liberties Committee of the European Parliament is
getting ready for its vote on blocking next week. 342 amendments have been
tabled to the Child Exploitation Directive as a whole, with 45 addressing
the issue of Internet blocking. While there is a large consensus that
blocking should not be mandatory on Member States, there is a wide
divergence of opinion on whether blocking should be promoted or not by the
Directive and whether "non-legislative" measures should be encouraged as a
means of achieving blocking.
|
http://www.edri.org/stop_web_blocking |
|
|