Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Unemployment went up to 9.6% while Reagan was in office, what's your point? It was AFTER 2 years that it started to drop, AFTER he spent money in a stimulus style of the time - that you now hate with Obama.
|
The rates are the same, their methods differ, or didn't you get the memo?
Quote:
|
Reagan was the 3rd round of cold war buildup's. The others failed to have a Russian leader that was willing to work towards peace, making what they did fail - that is correct.
|
Do you cry over spilt milk? Has nothing to do with the circumstances, it happened under Reagan.
Quote:
|
Maybe if the stimulus package was actually all spent... giving it the ability to do that, then maybe we could make that reach. But really not at all, being that a different leader is responsible for it falling.
|
So you're blaming bad management? Obama being in charge of that management?
Quote:
It's tradition to shake someone's hand here too, we don't really look down on those that hug us, or forget to shake hands - unless we attempted and they did nothing - then we get a bit snuffed over it. Hummm, probably like anyone else would if we didn't honor basic traditions but probably like us we won't get pissed if they don't get it perfectly right.
It's called logic...
I guess I've traveled the world and simply know that basically only the French are stuck enough up to douche you over if you don't get a tradition right.
|
I love how you argue with logic that doesn't work.
I keep remembering Bruce Lee kicking that guy in the head while he was bowing
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that