View Single Post
Old 02-08-2011, 01:04 AM  
closer
Confirmed User
 
closer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ICQ :: 34739932 :: Les Pays-Bas
Posts: 1,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey View Post
For what I've read and based on former legal cases affecting Google, it's my understanding that the difference is Google links to EVERYBODY by automatically crawling sites, which makes impossible not to link to questionable/illegal sites, while the sites seized ONLY LINK TO ILLEGAL SITES and there's a human effort to do that. In other words: Google may fail at filtering the illegal sites between billions of sites while the other domains have an illegal purpose by definition
An interesting point of view, could even hold up in court
__________________

HOT DOMAIN NAMES FOR SALE:
EUROPEAN: MACHO.FRKINKY.ESSEXTOONS.CO.UKDOT COMS: DJSEX.COMFAQBOX.COMWEBCAMSTV.COMSEXTWEET.COMPORNVOUCHER.COMGAYBF.COM | GAYBFF.COMGAYSEXDATE.COM | GAYSEXDATING.COM
closer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote