Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
As usual strawman arguments from you... I never claimed anything about LINKED pages. But ON their website. If name, address etc. is not there, ON their own website, then they can't claim safe harbor. That is very clear stated in law.
It works the same way as 2257: A post box address or email is not enough.
|
you said (you were totally wrong btw)
Quote:
|
They havent listed designated agent on their website as required (name, adress etc) so they do not qualify for safe harbor.
|
the problem is the only pages you can see are linke pages
if they had put up aasomerandomcharacters.htm in the rroot with that information you would never see it
yet you still claimed
QUOTE]They havent listed designated agent on their website as required (name, adress etc) so
they do not qualify for safe harbor. [/QUOTE]
there is no way shape or form you could make the claim yoou were doing unless you were talking about linked pages, since you could see hidden or unlinked pages until you asked them for it under a court order.
once they saw the court order, there is nothing to stop them from putting together a page with the right info and putting it in the root.
unless you hacked their website and did a directory dump you could prove they had falsified evidence.