Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
I'd be pissed if I was one of the other sites in Mark's network that sent the customer in and was making money from it just to have a chathost/another owner steal the customer and cut me out of the picture so they could make more of the money.
Most owners wouldn't care because in this case Mark still makes the same. However, even though he makes the same he was trying to protect his other clients.
So just because you and other people want to dismiss those type of activities why don't you cut the person who is trying to run a tight ship some slack for doing the right thing and trying police his site the way other cam sites should be doing too.
|
Your probably right and we do talk to owners of studios doing things like that but if I considered that stealing and cut peoples licenses up then I would probably have 4 models online instead of 1087 at the moment. There is no "owners manual" or guide book to running a cam site but I have always found it better to educate and work with studios rather than exterminate.
Your position is obvious and I admire you want to help your friend but at first look his software is superior to most I have seen with the exception being MFC. So why doesnt he have more studios running white labels (sorry thats about what they are) than he has? The next question is why so many conflicts between him and his licensees..... and I all I ask is show me 1 site doing well. His annual figure now changed to january of $22,945 isnt exactly getting me there. I would call that a bad day on 1 domain.
How can superior (at this point) software deliver low sales and angry people.