Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488
go back to porn in plastic mags and betamax tapes.
|
Bring back to the days when people had to buy porn to see it. Now that's a brilliant idea. Of course there were a few exceptions, but in the norm it was. You want porn, you buy it.
Remove all free porn. The notion that free porn generates porn sales is so wrong it's a surprise it needs to be explained. Doing it the way this industry did it. It's a mystery so many disagree.
Oh I got it, they were affiliates who were able to earn a living off giving away free porn. Can they even figure out how much they would of earned if the extent to the "free porn" was just a banner?
Robbie would be a billionaire instead of boasting he was a millionaire. Or broke.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bronco67
Male stars that can't resist the urge to jerk themselves off to finish a scene, when there's a hot girl there to do it for them. No one wants to see a guy whack his bag at the end of a scene. If you want to see that, then you would be a gay.
|
Getting rid of guys who are clueless about what porn is about would help.
On screen she might look hot, in front of the camera the guy is better off jerking himself off most of the time. She's cold, that's why he's doing himself.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bm bradley
magazines paying $3000 a set so PM would leave us alone
|
No I wouldn't. I was here telling every one the business model was wrong in 2000 when magazines sales did make $3,000 a set. The money here was cream on top of the cake. You being a one horse guy wouldn't understand the concept of selling your own content over and over again.