Quote:
Originally Posted by tabasco
I don't see that as a logical statement. NATS in this case is the system between the sponsor and affiliate. Registrar's, content management, hosting and processors have nothing to do with the affiliate... Well you could say they were using a website for fraudulent purposes I guess.
|
There's only one part of NATs that handles affiliates.. The rest of it manages the site join pages, interfacing with the processors, user management etc. etc. etc.
So why is it their responsibility? It's not... And why does NATs get mentioned but MPA or any others don't? I'm not a fan of NATs but the scum bags that rip us off aren't breaking any NATs licensing terms so there's nothing NATs can do about it. I understand the desire to get back at the scumbags but this is all about trying to get someone else to do it for you.