Quote:
Originally Posted by digitalfantasies
and here we are..
Male Circumcision and Risk for HIV Transmission
Several types of research have documented that male circumcision significantly reduces the risk of HIV acquisition by men during penile-vaginal sex.
Biologic Plausibility
Compared with the dry external skin surface, the inner mucosa of the foreskin has less keratinization (deposition of fibrous protein), a higher density of target cells for HIV infection (Langerhans cells), and is more susceptible to HIV infection than other penile tissue in laboratory studies.... and so one
Source: cdc.gov (center for disease control and prevention)
|
That is due to your skin tearing. If your skin tears of course it will have a greater chance of HIV. that has nothing to do with the foreskin. Anyone with half a brain knows that grown males should be able to pull back their foreskin. It is no longer tightened.
Unless your parents are backwards and never taught you how to wash your cock.
If you for 2 seconds think an uncircumcised cock cant have the skin torn you're a complete idiot. It also takes longer for a circumcised cock to heal risking their female partners more.
The study you speak of was also done in Africa where many parts it is part of their CULTURE to be circumcised explaining why they found certain findings.
"dry external surface" my skin is not dry. To think dry skin surface may be riskier in tearing? no couldnt be! it has NOTHING to do with circumcision you're brainwashed and stupid.