Quote:
Originally Posted by GUNNER
I think it's funny all the photogs saying they wouldn't hire her, and oh my gosh how could anyone...
Well, it's pretty simple and goes something kinda like this.
The girl has a current, valid test. Which means she "can" work in adult.
So whomever she hangs around with in her private life has no bearing... right?
In other words, you'd hire her just as you would any other adult model.
If you say no, then that means (by logical argument) that you wouldn't hire any adult actresses because of who should *might* be associating with in her private life.
|
I would not hire anyone when I know that the circumstances are as they are here.
I know for a fact that OSHA has dolled out 14K fines to, two producers that i know personally. I have seen the fines myself. These fines were because the shot the little gay kid "Benedict" Burts without a condom. And when they shot him, he too had a clean test.
Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for.
Let me repeat it for you people that skim this post and may have missed it: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!
Let me repeat it for you guys that think that they know it all: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!
One more time for the know it all Canadian "Know it all" Web master: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!
And one more time for the "slow" producer: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!!
And lastly once for the GFY surfer: Producers, make no bones about it, you will be on the hook for the 14K fine, not the company that you shot the content for!!
Now knowing that you as the producer are on the hook for the 14K fine, will you shoot some cute girl who still bangs her HIV positive boyfriend on the daily? Or move onto the next girl on your approved list?
What if you are booking her for a POV? Same facts as above. Would you bang her?
Keep in mind this is a very real fine. My friend has already dropped 5K on an attorney who will fight this. But thats 5K that he will never get back.
But his test was clean.... OSHA doesn't give a shit and don't want to hear it!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by billywatson
This is certainly a valid argument. If Kaycee Brooks/Summer has a valid test, she's just as good to go as any other performer in this industry...unless we start policing and/or evaluating everyone's personal lives, this girl has just as much of a right to work as any other performer.
Imagine if we really could police/evaluate EVERY adult performer's private life...I dunno if there would be any sort of "industry" left.
|
Nice argument, nice theory. Im here to reduce the chances of getting a 14K fine. Im not trying to be right or win a GFY argument.
The only way to do that is to avoid the "Known Dangers" and hope for the best on the unknown dangers.
For you producers that know me, call me, I will enlighten you on who got what fine and why. If you don't know me, ICQ me and I will ICQ my phone number so we can talk.
And if you already know it all and think im full of shit, I will send "Summer" your contact info and you might even get a good deal. After all, she has a clean test.
